🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.